http://www.omnitrace.com/birth-family.html
Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog

01/30/08

Advocating for foster care improvements

Posted by : Nancy Spoolstra in Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog at 09:36 pm , 603 words, 669 views  
Categories: The System, Websites
I didn’t get this written in a very timely fashion today because I spent most of the morning on the telephone. For 90 minutes I spoke with Andrew Bridge, author of Hope’s Boy. Before making my next telephone appointment, I paid the guy who brought me more firewood and dealt with the fitness tech who (partially) repaired our treadmill. (It doesn’t elevate now … oh darn. I never liked that anyway!) My next phone call was with Jeff Katz, the driving force behind Listening to Parents—a nationwide effort to improve communication between foster and adoptive parents and the child welfare system.

I thoroughly enjoyed both conversations and I look forward to future communications with these two gentlemen. Andrew begins a book tour shortly. I took copious notes and I will share some of Andrew’s thoughts in upcoming blogs about foster care in general and his experience in particular. Jeff is most interested in generating more traffic to the Listening to Parents website and developing a nationwide swell of voices that legislators are unable to ignore. Jeff’s target population is pre-adoptive parents as well as current foster and adoptive parents. The Attachment & Trauma Network mostly serves parents who have already adopted, although we do occasionally assist pre-adoptive parents. But in terms of services needed after the adoption, ATN’s mission statement aligns nicely with the goals of Listening to Parents.

My conversations with both men overlapped in terms of discussing the foster care system and the needs of everyone involved … the kids, the foster and adoptive parents, and the birth parents. Let me leave you with these thoughts from Andrew, who in addition to being a product of foster care, pursued a career as an attorney advocate for foster children:
** Only the stories that break out of the norm of what it means to be in foster care make the news. Touching, beautiful stories or horrific abuse at the hands of foster parents. What we don’t see is the vast middle or vast majority of kids who lead lonely, quiet lives.

** In terms of abuse vs. neglect, overwhelmingly children are in foster care because of issues around neglect. Under that, there are issues of poverty and drugs.

** There is a generalized absence of mental health care in this country. The government paves streets and removes garbage well, but when it comes for caring for individual people’s lives, they do very, very poorly. We see it across the board—veterans, elder care, foster care.

SPONSOR
I asked Andrew his view of the "average" foster parent. This was his response:
The majority of them are making a good, sincere effort to care for kids. This goes back to what I said before about the press coverage. The average parent is a struggling individual trying to do their best and receiving far less support than they should be receiving through their licensing agency. Foster parents are not doing it for the money … when you look at how little money they receive, it doesn’t make sense! There is a class action suit occurring in California right now that has shown you will make more money if you kennel dogs than you will taking in foster kids, and frankly it will be much easier! I do not buy the argument that foster parents do it for the money. The same is true for most social workers, who also don’t receive agency support in their jobs.
I have much more to share from my conversation with Andrew. I strongly encourage you to get his book. Beth started reading it tonight!

Photo Credit

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Chromesthesia [Member] Email
He's sensible.
I'm going to find his book and read what he has to say.
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/08 @ 05:30
Comment from: Kelly [Member] Email · http://fost-adopt.adoptionblogs.com
I can't wait to read more. Their thoughts and comments are right on!! Do they have thoughts on advocacy or changing the system?
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/08 @ 07:38
Comment from: CREAMPUFF_SUGAR [Member] Email
My question for Andrew is: Are these kids any better off in foster care than they would have been in the situation that they were "saved" from?
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/08 @ 11:04
Comment from: eastern girl [Member] Email
You know, I've wondered the same as Creampuff. Maybe these kids would have been better served in their own homes than removed to foster care. Maybe we could make sure they have 3 meals a day and that their parents have access to 24 hour daycare for them instead of leaving them alone.Someone else could buy their clothes and take them to the doctor. I know this makes people get their back up, this talk of basically raising someone else's kid because they're too irresponsible to do it themselves, but the alternative, foster care, really doesn't seem to work either for the child or for society at large.
PermalinkPermalink 01/31/08 @ 17:52
Comment from: paulukon [Member] Email
But foster care *does* work for many kids. Not that I disagree that more supports for some parents would enable them to properly care for their children. But it's not true for all parents.
PermalinkPermalink 02/01/08 @ 09:40
Comment from: CREAMPUFF_SUGAR [Member] Email
Paulukon~ Could you provide some literature or research showing that foster care works? I agree there are some horrific situations out there, but it seems that foster care is a hit and miss prospect. I can think of one little girl--and I realize that this is just an instance and not representative--who was moved many times (15) before being placed with her adoptive family. She was with one foster family that wanted to adopt her, but because she was not in the county she was supposed to be in and the county wanted her back in the county she originated in, she was moved and it seems at that point, all trust was lost. This child is now in a group home because her adoptive family just couldn't cope with her many issue~at age 7. It just seems that the foster system works to stay within its rules and not for the "best of the children" and, oh, how sick I am of that term. A family we know was told that at least 60 people would be involved in their lives if they were going through with fostering. It beats me why so many are necessary, but I have to say that maybe that gauntlet will prepare people for the gauntlet of behaviors.

I didn't go through foster care to adopt; we consciously made a decision to adopt overseas so that we would not be under the eye of governmental supervision. I am grateful we didn't because when we adopted, we had so many behaviours with our two that I would have accessed the services and given up the children to someone else. I am glad that I didn't have that opportunity ...well, it just prohibitively expensive. It forced us to look for resources ourselves and we learned so much.

I can't say it's easy, but it is certainly easier than having someone watching over me and believing my RAD kids and not me.
PermalinkPermalink 02/01/08 @ 11:50
Comment from: plhearon [Member]
Foster care does work. You have to consider how many foster kids there are and then the percentage that it doesn't work for. We have fostered aprox. 40 children. Had two moved, adopted 6 and all but 1 went to good situations whether it was with the parents or realitives. Our 8 year old daughter was in foster care for 4 years before she came to live with us. We have had her for 2 years and we are still paying for her being in 13 different placements. So foster care hurt her. She was also in a group home for a year before we got her. If they had of terminated when she was 3 she wouldn't have near as many problems, but I still have to say that over all foster care does work. It just has a lot of flaws and a lot of laws need to be changed.
PermalinkPermalink 02/09/08 @ 22:16
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Julie
  • Guest Users: 147