Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog

10/03/07

Judgments or Support?

Posted by : Nancy Spoolstra in Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog at 08:17 am , 521 words, 273 views  
Categories: Adoption Disruption
I don’t know how many families I have worked with over the years, but it has been many. Represented in that overall sample were quite a few families in crisis, some of whom went on to disrupt. Through no plans of my own, I have come to be considered the “Disruption Guru” by many in the industry—a moniker which actually creates issues for me on many fronts. I have learned many, many things about families, relationships, attachment, stress responses, coping skills and human behavior over the course of this past 15 years. Here is one bottom line thing I hang on to: I try very, very hard not to make judgments about why people disrupt a placement. In most cases, I am “right there with them.” In other situations, it isn’t so clear, but the absolute bottom line is—what is the best avenue for the child?


I have heard it said that once folks start talking about disrupting, it will, in all probability, become a reality. That has certainly been my experience. When I first began working with Beth’s family, they were done in their heart, but not in their head. It took about 2 months for them to admit what they already knew. That was a very strange situation for me, because I was wearing multiple hats. I knew I wanted to take Beth, but I was determined to not lead or influence her first family’s decision in any way. They eventually were able to admit to themselves that they were done, and we began the process of making it happen.


As one reader commented in this blog,


But honestly, I'd rather see a family disrupt—cold or not—than to leave a child with a family that either didn't want them or couldn't parent them.

SPONSOR



I completely agree with this statement. If it isn’t working, it isn’t working. Making judgments will not help the child at all … so I prefer to focus my energies on getting the child in a different environment and making things better for all concerned. If a child needs to be moved, the fallout to both child and family will most certainly need to be addressed, and making judgments about the reasons won’t change a thing.


I may not agree with some of the details of how this transfer was handled, but knowing how ready to be done the sending family is, I am glad for them and for Dora that they no longer have to coexist so unhappily with each other. I was once more judgmental in my view of why this happens, but no longer. People are imperfect—parents and kids—and it is what it is. We (a collective "we"--social workers, agencies, adoption professionals in general) should do what we can to identify and address those imperfections, but many will be missed. As Barbara Holtan once said, "As long as there are adoptions, there will be disruptions." I agree.


Open adoptions after disruption


Disruptions and underground networks, Part One

Part Two: Risks and Responsibilities

Part Three: Decisions of the heart or head?




Photo Credit

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: pat johnston [Member] Email · http://www.perspectivespress.com
Nancy, the link to "Disruptions and underground networks, Part One" does not work.
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 09:26
Comment from: pat johnston [Member] Email · http://www.perspectivespress.com
Sorry, I meant that the link to imbedded in that article --"never got around to talking about that nefarious “underground network” that was mentioned in this article." doesn't work. I'd like to read the article about "nefarious underground networks"
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 09:29
Comment from: Nancy Spoolstra [Member] Email · http://attachment-disorder.adoptionblogs.com/
It's fixed now, thanks for telling me!
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 09:32
Comment from: Sunbonnet Sue [Member] Email
Oiy. This entire thread is making my brain hurt. And that hole in my heart is throbing too. So am feeling a little overwhelmed and weepy.

Yes, what Nancy said. Don't judge. Who has time and patience to hear the whole story? It will take more than a two minute sound byte. It will be emotionally draining to listen to.

It is common for people to gravitate towards oversimplification of complex issues. The majority are happy to snag a snippet of info and run with it.

Adoptive parents seem to be one of the minority groups it is okay to hate, malign, and disrespect. Amazingly, it's often those within the adoption community who are quickest to call for the tar and feathers.

PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 16:25
Comment from: nancyderen [Member] Email
I just feel such sadness about how disruptions are often handled. My daughter had disrupted three times from pre-adoptive placements (as well as several foster homes) and was very scarred by how it was handled. One of the disruptions was almost as traumatic for her as some of the abuse she went through. And there have been many other situations in our agency where the disruption was far from handled in a child-centered way. I think people in crisis need non-judmental support, but I also think there should be clear expectations of how a disruption should be handled, things like a clear-cut good-bye visit, a good-bye letter, all personal items returned to the child in a reasonable period of tiem, etc. There are so many ways these sitations can become even more painful than they have to be.
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 16:52
Comment from: pat johnston [Member] Email · http://www.perspectivespress.com
Nancyderen, I agree about the need for clear expectations about how a disruption should be handled. The problem is that this is nearly impossible when things are done between families, independently, rather than with the guidance of a professional standing in the middle and directing--hopefully a counseling professional whose first allegiance is to the child.

Since there are some agencies out there which DO frequently handle disruptions and re-placements, and since they would be more likely to be objective, probably more supportive, and certainly more "seasoned" than the original placing agency, I think it's in the best interests of children to use such intermediaries.

Sorry, Nancy S, my long time friend. I don't mean to criticize or offend or have you take this personally. You are far from the average parent of a re-placed child.

Pat
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 17:02
Comment from: Sunbonnet Sue [Member] Email
Agencies do need to be involved in disruption. Standards must be formulated so the involvement helps rather than hurts. The adoption community needs to draw together and figure out how that is going to look. The agency "A child is Waiting," has a good start. They are unknown to many parents, so getting the word out about them is maybe a good place to start. Then replicating their program and improving on it, if it proves to be a successful model.

Our agency before finalization: The kids are resilient. They will be fine as soon as they achieve permanence. Besides, if you need help at any point in the future, come right back to us and we'll be glad to help you.

Only trouble was, someone forgot to tell the kids that a legal document would be the cure for all their ills. Plus, we were naive and believed what the adoption professionals told us.

Our agency post finalization, upon our return and request for help: you will have to pay for the help we force you to receive. We've know what is best for your child, and we can get a judges order to force you to do what we say. If you don't obey the order, the DA will file criminal charges against you. You will pay for those too. If your child damages anything, you will pay for that too.

NEVER has our family EVER been treated with the disrespect we received from our agency when we asked for very, very reasonable help. We went from "good, noble, adoptive family" to "bad, criminal adoptive family" in a heartbeat.

Nothing in our experience with disruption had much to do with best interest of the child. It was about placing blame and fulfilling legal mandates. The financial ball was passed back and forth, back and forth.

Another thing is, why is the individual child more important than the entire family unit? How can a child thrive without a family? We placed our girl asking for help and treatment. The agency acted as if the rest of our family didn't exist.

This conversation, while a strain, has been great. It's the first time these issues have been discussed with the level of acceptance and respect we've seen here. It's excellent progress for the world of adoption.
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 20:13
Comment from: Lindy [Member] Email
Unfortunately, as long as the stigma of disruption exists, reform in the way of constructive replacements will be slow and painful for all involved. Not only are dreams dashed and finances drained, but families are left to mourn and heal on their own. Most of society does not want to recognize that adoption is a process that may take a lifetime to complete successfully. Society does not want to know that these wounded children can totally demolish a family. Society wants the happy "Hollywood" ending (i.e. Angelina, Meg, Mary Louise, etc.) to adoption. That's why it is so vital that those of us in the trenches support one another and get the word out to the professionals that we need real help, not just lip service. We need real understanding, real funding, real respite and realistic portrayals of what adoption of a particular child looks like. Most of all, we need to know that we have some kind of safety net when we fall, because many of us will fall. Loving a child is one thing....surviving a RAD child is a whole different story.
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 21:22
Comment from: nicegirlphd [Member] Email
I am usually very non-judgemental, but to be honest, it is hard to be completely non-judgemental when I really do not understand and cannot imagine a situation where those actions are good for the child. To be clear, I am NOT talking about disruptions in general. I am asking about a disruption where the mother, who the child is attached to, disappeared and did not say good bye, and then was never available again. I can understand and sympathize with why the mother feels like doing this (really, I do). But I cannot imagine a situation where this is in the best interest of the child, not being able to say good bye. So it's hard for me not to judge this as selfish.

That said, I agree that it is usually not helpful to judge (the only exceptions are if the judging can help change the situation for the better, or validate the child in some positive way - but that's not usually the case). If we cannot change the situation, it's better to not criticize, and focus on the child instead. And that's what Nancy has been doing (based on her blog), which I think is great.
PermalinkPermalink 10/04/07 @ 08:30
Comment from: Sunbonnet Sue [Member] Email
The first adoptive mother and father are not available for now. That is different from never again.

You're right PHD girl, learning to be non-judgemental is hard. With a capital H! It is a tool that requires purposeful development, certainly is not an automatic skill.
PermalinkPermalink 10/04/07 @ 10:37
Comment from: Sunbonnet Sue [Member] Email
oh, one more thing came to mind. sorry to be a bore, as you might imagine, this has thread has generated a lot of thinking.

The first adoptive parents made sure their girl is in a safe place, with all the tools and resources she needs to continue moving forward with her life. They very likely then collapsed into an exhausted heap, doing the bare minimum in all areas of their lives for a time. How long that time lasts is an unknown. Strong emotional and physical support will certainly shorten the time. Harsh judgements and second guessing their motives and actions will certainly lengthen their recovery time.

They are now trauma survivors too. Even if it is deemed they caused their own accident, and they are at fault, their needs remain the same. The sooner they get patched back up, the sooner they can become available to Dora again. Not in a parental capacity, but in a supportive way.

When you live for long periods of time with attachment challenged children, you learn to tell that child "no" or "not now" or "wait" a lot. an awful lot. It's the only way to survive.

Their requests, while appearing heartfelt, are most often superficial and based in their need for control. The abilities they develop to peg the requests that feed their victim mentality the most effeciently is truly impressive.

Please do not think this means they never have legitimate needs or requests, or that parents always tell these children "no" automatically. It is simply that as the parents, we learn to not base our decisions soley on what is coming from the mouth.
PermalinkPermalink 10/05/07 @ 09:54
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • mrswendymireles
  • Guest Users: 112