Part One
Part Two
Part Three
Concluding this series on how better services would be provided to our children if the juvenile justice systems and child welfare systems worked together, the final point is:
Attorneys representing youth often lack a firm understanding of the youth’s experiences with the child welfare system and the effects of involvement.
Apparently many judges interviewed for this article stated their belief that more attorneys need to be well-versed in both juvenile law and child welfare law. Often it is the trial attorney (typically a public defender) who presents a case in court, but he needs to understand the impact being a “system child” has on his client, as well as how to “work the system” and find the best solutions and best placement for the youth.
Isn’t this true for
all folks who deal with these kids? How many times have we as parents tried to educate all the various “professionals” who make life-impacting decisions about our kids? How can anyone really make good recommendations about how best to serve foster or adopted kids if they don’t understand even the basic issues involved with attachment, grief and loss?
This article concludes with recommendations made by
Children’s Rights advocates. These proposed changes are suggestions that I have heard foster parents clamoring about for years. They include things like:
• More training for foster parents and group home staff
• Dually trained attorneys (child welfare and juvenile justice)
• Immediate, mandatory notification to all adults responsible for the youth concerning all delinquency hearings and proceedings; mandatory attendance of adults directly responsible for the youth and optional, invited attendance for interested parties
• Better delineation and cooperation of services provided by both branches involved with delinquent youth, including interdisciplinary training
One of the final statements echoes my oft-repeated sentiments:
Youth in foster care must be well served by foster families; receive mental health, education, and other needed services; and have safe, permanent families—whether through reunification, long-term placement with relatives, or adoption.
SPONSOR
I would add “adopted youth” to that statement as well; certainly in terms of “mental health, education and other needed services.” Just because they are “out of the system” doesn’t mean they should be “out of the services.”
Photo Credit