http://www.omnitrace.com/birth-family.html
Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog

08/23/07

Steel box with a velvet lining ... not least restrictive environment

Posted by : Nancy Spoolstra in Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog at 09:54 pm , 462 words, 169 views  
Categories: Preparing to bring your child home
kansas schoolMany experienced teachers begin the school year by putting the fear of God into their students on the first day of school. At least, that is the impression I have received from Beth, and I think I used to hear it from the older kids. It was so long ago, I’m not sure!


Why would a teacher prefer to “come down hard” and then lighten up, as opposed to giving the kids a chance to prove that they need more structure and control? Because many teachers have learned it is much easier to lighten up than it is to backpeddle and institute restrictions that were not in place initially.


Teachers often take this approach because they understand they need to be in charge of their classroom. They understand children can’t learn in an environment where chaos reins.


One term often thrown around in special education settings is least restrictive environment. This refers to the gold standard of teaching a special needs child in the most “normal” environment possible while still meeting that child’s needs.

SPONSOR
http://omnitrace.com/


One of the extended family members of the child we are meeting this weekend was wondering why it would be necessary for me to institute a restricted environment immediately, rather than assessing the child for issues and respond accordingly. It is a legitimate question. Why will I approach it that way?


This is far more important than “maintaining control of my classroom.” This has to do with making a child feel safe. Safe in the care of an adult who is clearly in charge (in a benign, nurturing way), clearly cares enough about the child to institute and maintain that degree of structure, and parents in such a way that the child has few opportunities to fail and many opportunities to succeed. Providing children with minimal structure in the beginning and allowing kids to “fail” when they blast past those boundaries is reinforcing all the negative behaviors we hope to eradicate. This is exactly like that toddler who knows he can safely explore, because Mom is right there keeping him safe. He has far more autonomy when he knows he doesn’t have to be the boss of himself … his loving, attentive mom has his best interests at heart and is looking out for him.


I am more than capable of adjusting my parenting approach as needed, and I would like nothing better than to be able to “back off” this child as quickly as possible. But I need to see what kind of internal self-control is present before I throw caution to the wind.


Structure is not a hair-raising experience

Steel box with a velvet lining


For information/instructions on how to subscribe FREE to your favorite AdoptionBlogs, please visit this link.

Photo Credit

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: John [Member] Email
Being retired, I work part time as a subtitute teacher. Many days are 'first' school days for the sub with that class. Starting out nice, and then tightening up when needed, almost always is a disaster. The kids are going to push until they find out that you will maintain structure, and that you will be in charge. If you don't have control, no learning will take place. John
PermalinkPermalink 08/23/07 @ 23:32
Comment from: romee_1101 [Member] Email
Actually, as a teacher who is looking at starting the school year again, creating structure and discipline immediately is creating a safe place for your students. Certainly, I want to maintain control of my classroom, but kids want and need to know who is in charge whether it is in the classroom or at home. And - it is always much easier to ease up than to suddenly tighten up the restrictions.

Romee
PermalinkPermalink 08/24/07 @ 05:13
Comment from: Julie [Member] Email · http://special-needs.adoptionblogs.com/
We used to live next door to the sweetest young woman who was a science middle school teacher. One afternoon I was speaking to her and noticed she was uncharacteristically grumpy and short. "What's wrong?" I asked. "We're in the 1st two weeks of school and I have to be the teacher from h*ll," she replied. "It is so not my personality that I hope these kids hurry up and respond so I can start to treat them nice." This young thing totally GOT IT about the need for tight structure before the ability to really nurture and the balance between the two.

If only all parents and teachers understood this!

I am going to take exception with you linking least restrictive environment (LRE) to all of this. I think each classroom (and home) should be a steel box with velvet lining for all kids. LRE is an important legal concept in special education and parents/teachers are easily confused. It is a requirement of IDEA that a child's placement be in the least restrictive environment where he/she is capable of learning -- it is basically there to protect special ed children from being warehoused and shuttled out of sight, but integrated as much as possible with healthy peers -- I know YOU already know this, but don't want readers to get the impression that children with special needs shouldn't have steel boxes with velvet lining...they most certainly need all the structure/nurture they can get - perhaps much more than healthy children ever will.

Am praying for you and your potentially new addition...
PermalinkPermalink 08/24/07 @ 07:02
Comment from: Nancy Spoolstra [Member] Email · http://attachment-disorder.adoptionblogs.com/
Thanks for clarifying that for readers, Julie. I did know that ... but I used that terminology because that is the term used by the family member with whom I spoke. I believe she understands why I will keep this child surrounded by tight structure, but still, that was her frame of reference.

We're heading to the airport shortly ... I am MOST excited!
PermalinkPermalink 08/24/07 @ 07:08
Comment from: Sunbonnet Sue [Member] Email
least restrictive environment is the GOAL, not the starting point. Good clarification, Julie. Nancy, this young person is coming to your family with a significant history. The fact her current family is struggling should be enough information to illustrate why LRE does not work for her. for now. Stick to your guns!
PermalinkPermalink 08/24/07 @ 10:16
Comment from: nancyderen [Member] Email
LRE is supposed to be the least restrictive environment in which a child can learn and grow and be safe- lots of times that needs to be pretty restrictive! I don't think there is really any contradiction here. A kid with a trauma history may look like he or she can handle a pretty non-restrictive environment, but often the kid ends up not feeling safe and therefore not learning and not developing emotionally and academically. The least restrictive environment that can meet the child's needs may need to be very restrictive. Any family member who objects to a particular structure based on LRE could be reminded that in that concept, restrictions that are there to help the child are ok, it is just restrictions that are there to keep the kid isolated and away from non-disabled peers due to discrimination that are not ok.
PermalinkPermalink 08/24/07 @ 14:49
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 168