Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog

10/02/07

The agency responsibility in disruptions

Posted by : Nancy Spoolstra in Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog at 08:14 pm , 392 words, 223 views  
Categories: Adoption Disruption
I have enjoyed the lively discussion occurring about adoption disruption and the reasons behind it.


One of the recurring themes in the readers’ comments has been the role of agencies in adoption disruption. I can’t tell you how many times I have had parents tell me their agency response was, “Really? Your child has attachment issues? We’ve never had any child have those problems before!”


I still remember calling our placing agency when my family was imploding—and imploding in a huge, critical fashion—and the agency worker said, “Find someone who knows about attachment disorder!” CLICK went the phone … and I was on my own.


In the case of the child we disrupted, it was absolutely an “agency” driven debacle. I use the term “agency” loosely, because the agency consisted of one woman at that time. We were at her home for a July 4th party, six months after we moved 500 miles away from friends and family to Kansas into a home we built; one year after my husband had started a new job; one year after we had added a post-institutionalized 9-year-old; and we were currently parenting another troubled child. My husband once told me of a list he had seen of the top ten stressors in life/marriage, and they included: moving, building a home, adding a child, and taking a new job. We pretty much covered that, didn’t we? So here we are at this party, and this social worker drops the international waiting kid book in my lap. Do you think it was the word Sucker! emblazoned across my forehead? Five months later we bring home a 14-year-old girl, disrupting birth order to boot. I didn’t know what I didn’t know. I was still in the “love fixes everything” stage. I’m a sucker for kids and I was suckered. Six months later the girl left, and we had more wounds to add to our already heavily damaged family. To add major insult to injury, the social worker repeatedly told me there was no way I could have three troubled kids—clearly I was the problem. I learned a few months ago that this particular social worker never did grasp the degree of damage she did to families … she never did “get it.” I wonder how many families she wrecked?

SPONSOR


Photo Credit

Comments, Pingbacks:

Comment from: Cerise [Member] Email
Oh, that is a wrecking ball. I thought it was a mutated lobster claw at first.

Social workers' egos have always looked like dangerous territory to me.
PermalinkPermalink 10/02/07 @ 21:26
Comment from: bumblebeeskies [Member] Email
Nancy,

I guess I still don't "get" why Dora's adoption disrupted. From what I've read, it seems she had bonded with her aparents, and even has meltdowns now, from the pain of losing them. I understand that she often has passive-agressive behaviors, but so do a lot of children. I'm so used to reading about disruptions due to being a sex perp., physically injuring siblings, killing pets, trying to kill family members, etc. Unless I missed one of your posts, where you named off some horrible behaviors of hers, I just don't see her like that. I know the amom was struggling with her health, but such things happen with "homemade" families every day. I have yet to hear of someone handing their child over to cps because the child had some problems and either mom or dad was in poor health. I have to be honest, and say that what I think they did was horrid! I sincerely hope that Dora does not blame herself. Guilt can destroy a person, even a child.
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 06:34
Comment from: pat johnston [Member] Email · http://www.perspectivespress.com
Yes, bumblebeeskies, this has been my frustration with this family, too.
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 07:31
Comment from: paulukon [Member] Email
I suspect Nancy cannot tell us exactly what has gone on due to confidentiality of both the family and Dora. Even if nothing outwardly horrible was going on, isn't it better that a child find a nurturing home sooner rather than later or never? Even if things were pretty simple that the parents, for whatever reasons, did not feel attached to Dora...can you imagine living with someone in your home that you feel is a stranger while going through cancer (or whatever illness it is the Mom is going through)?

Maybe I have more sympathy because because of a family situation. I have a kid SIL (adopted). During her first years with the family, I simply did not like her. I didn't hate her, but I was very much against her joining the family and felt no attachment to her at all. Due to miscommunication, my MIL thought we had offered to become her parents when MIL dies. I was utterly horrified at the idea of becoming this child's parents. In this case, I've had a chance to get to know this child, but imagine if she joined my family in an international adoption where you might be lucky to have spent a couple hours with her. And then imagine a few years later feeling the same way I did after knowing her for a few years. (Now that she's been in the family a few years and is getting better, I think it could be doable. But I still doubt we would be the best family for her. I think we would have major attachment issues.)

I guess overall I just think it better that families try to find the right families for their children, biological or adopted. Most of the time, it's in the family they are in. But not always. Would we be mad at a family of a biological 9 year old who realized they could not parent their child anymore and lovingly made an appropriate adoption plan? I certainly wouldn't--far better to have a disruption (or, a second adoption as I'd prefer it called) than to remain in a family that cannot parent before something truly horrible does occur.
PermalinkPermalink 10/03/07 @ 13:06
Leave a Comment: You need to login to leave comments.:

Login | Register

Login To AdoptionBlogs.com

Search

Sponsors

Misc

Subscribe to Reactive Attachment Disorder Blog

 Enter your email address:
 

 

Who's Online?

  • Guest Users: 100